From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 17 20:59:52 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7246F3F8
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:59:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.h3q.com (mail.h3q.com [213.73.89.199])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34A612B2
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:59:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 38039 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2014 20:53:09 -0000
Received: from mail.h3q.com (HELO mail.h3q.com) (mail.h3q.com)
 by mail.h3q.com with CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 17 Apr 2014 20:53:09 -0000
Message-ID: <53503F32.3000400@h3q.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:53:06 +0200
From: Philipp Wuensche <cryx-freebsd@h3q.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.9 (Macintosh/20140129)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Subject: Re: jailaudit and pkg
References: <53503DA3.6060202@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <53503DA3.6060202@netfence.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 20:59:52 -0000

Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I'm not sure, but I might have find an unintended behaviour in jailaudit.
> 
> I have a system which I have not yet migrated to pkgng (neither base nor
> any jail).
> However, pkg has been installed by the latest net-snmp upgrade (why I
> don't know).
> 
> Now this is what I get:
>> # jailaudit generate
>>
>> Downloading a current audit database:
>> pkgng support enabled, using /usr/local/sbin/pkg version 1.2.7_2.
>>
>> pkg: No packages installed
>> pkg: No packages installed
>> pkg: No packages installed

jailaudit trys so get pkgng information from all jails running, this
message is coming from pkg not getting any information in those jails.

> AFAICT jailaudit sees the pkg port and thinks all jails have been
> converted to pkgng; this renders it useless for any jail which is still
> managed the old way.
> Of course I could be using pkgng in some jails and/or the base system;
> still it would not work for the other jails.
> 
> Am I wrong? Is there a workaround?

jailaudit still sees the old-style packages in your jail. It is always
trying both package systems because (in some horrible way) they both can
coexist. So nothing is wrong and no workaround is needed!

Greetings,
Philipp