From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 03:43:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF1337B401 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 03:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A321843F3F for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 03:43:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h62AhuVm014918; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:43:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h62Ahtna014917; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:43:56 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h62Aggig032205; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 11:42:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200307021042.h62Aggig032205@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Paul Robinson In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:15:32 BST." <20030702101532.GG17757@iconoplex.co.uk> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 11:42:41 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RMS says: "Use BSD, for goodness sake!" X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:43:59 -0000 Paul Robinson writes: > To be honest, I think it's a useful exercise that got out of control because > of people's ideological or passionate beliefs. The impact in -CURRENT of > typing 'rm -rf /usr/src/gnu' is relatively low for most users who don't > write code. You'd lose the ability to read man pages. This is not low-impact. > Now, DIE THREAD! DIE! DIE! DIE! . I'd much rather talk > about those laser-wielding polar bears for a bit. If you sail into a battle-zone with guns blazing, expect to have return fire. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH