From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 13 1:59:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDCD37B502 for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA10082; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010130859.BAA10082@implode.root.com> To: Antony T Curtis Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf leakage on 4.1.1-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:37:55 BST." <39E6C9E3.FAFF6C47@abacus.co.uk> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 01:59:46 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >"Kuriyama, Kent K Mr (CPF N651KK)" wrote: >> >> Chris, >> >> Your email prompted me to look at mbuf utilization on a 4.1.1-STABLE box >> that is currently not in production. >> >> outside# netstat -m >> 130/160/7168 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): >> 129 mbufs allocated to data >> 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers >> 128/136/1792 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) >> 312 Kbytes allocated to network (92% in use) >> ^^^^^^^^^^ Perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, but none of these reports has indicated a problem. The "92%" above is the percent of buffers that have been allocated and are currently in-use. The system allocates more when the pool runs out. The % in use is essentially a useless number that shouldn't even be reported because it just causes confusion about what it means. -DG David Greenman Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message