From owner-freebsd-net Thu Mar 18 15:27:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DD21548F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id AAA01798 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:27:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 249A187B6; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:11:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 00:11:24 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SKIP on 3.1 Message-ID: <19990319001124.A6669@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <199903182204.OAA94934@bubba.whistle.com> <36F18016.5BA99C21@utcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <36F18016.5BA99C21@utcorp.com>; from Kurt Seel on Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 05:37:10PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5130 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Kurt Seel: > The only caveat for is that I can't talk to the far 10.x net from one of > the routers :-( That's why NAT & RFC-1918 address space usage is evil. End-to-end connec- tivity is not garanteed any more and that breaks a lot of things. I know people have problem getting addresses but that should push IPv6 more, not promote hacks such as NAT. No offense to authors of natd intended of course. Sorry for the rant, I know NAT is useful for many people, I just abhorr it. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #70: Sat Feb 27 09:43:08 CET 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message