From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Mar 29 15:28:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (stampede.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACBE14C4C for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:28:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu ([207.92.173.144]) by stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA14797; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:28:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id PAA33893; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:27:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:27:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903292327.PAA33893@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: robinson@netrinsics.com Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199903291308.VAA04415@netrinsics.com> (message from Michael Robinson on Mon, 29 Mar 1999 21:08:19 +0800 (CST)) Subject: Re: newbus and newconfig From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami) References: <199903291308.VAA04415@netrinsics.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Michael Robinson * It sort of seems like this can happen one of two ways: * * 1. These issues are discussed and decided before all the code gets written. * 2. These issues are discussed and decided after all the code gets written. That is a good point. It appears to me that, so far, both parties have preferred to go for option 2 and talk only in closed mailing lists among their friends. I invite developers from both parties to convene in a public mailing list (either this one or -hackers) to discuss the architectural issues for awhile. * (Of course, this observation is based on the assumption that all the code * does, in fact, get written.) I hope that this observation is, in fact, correct. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message