From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 26 07:49:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E4D16A40F for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com (omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.82.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82D743D46 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:49:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@areilly.bpa.nu) Received: from areilly.bpa.nu ([141.168.2.3]) by omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061026074909.WPXA11173.omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@areilly.bpa.nu> for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:49:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 51667 invoked by uid 501); 26 Oct 2006 07:46:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:46:54 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly To: Tony Maher Message-ID: <20061026074654.GC47902@duncan.reilly.home> References: <17719.43574.819134.370333@roam.psg.com> <20061020005501.R32598@fledge.watson.org> <20061023060431.GA3186@duncan.reilly.home> <453D9F1A.5040803@FreeBSD.org> <20061026060221.GA47902@duncan.reilly.home> <4540525D.1090308@uts.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4540525D.1090308@uts.edu.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Randy Bush , Robert Watson , Doug Barton , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: 5 to 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:49:12 -0000 On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 04:14:53PM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > dumpfs / | more > magic 19540119 (UFS2) time Thu Oct 26 14:29:14 2006 Thanks for the tip. Same on this system, so I must have given it a proper clean install when I moved to 5.3. The dumpfs output seems to say a lot of interesting things. Might dumpfs /usr be able to tell me why the 6.2-BETA kernel/fsck can't find it's super-blocks? Hmm, that's odd. Most of the 400 cylinder groups in /usr have a "time" value that is in about the last month (most much closer to "now" than that). The very last one doesn't seem to have been touched since Jul 2005, which is plausibly when I formatted it. Neither does it list any inodes used. Is this normal behaviour or a sign of something ill? Cheers, -- Andrew