From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 27 06:08:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD4316A41F; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22BB43D46; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:08:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6R6Hm46001219; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:17:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42E724D0.1010608@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:08:16 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <42E583F9.3070703@rogers.com> <200507261853.07513.peter@wemm.org> <1242.172.16.0.199.1122429678.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <200507271215.14369.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <42E6F5EA.7030801@samsco.org> <42E71F77.6010705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <42E71F77.6010705@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Peter Wemm , Mike Jakubik Subject: Re: dhclient sucks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:08:35 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >> Part of the point of going to the new codebase was to free us from >> being locked into vendor sources that we couldn't easily change. > > > It's not at all clear to me how the ISC license prevented us from easily > changing anything. There may have been other compelling reasons to > change code, but I would need this one explained in more detail to be > convinced. > > Doug > Not that it was a license issue, it was that changing and adding code specific to FreeBSD would have made future vendor imports hard, just like with any other vendor codebase. Scott