From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 24 12:22:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA22063 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:22:39 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA22057 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:22:31 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA27169 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sat, 24 Jun 1995 14:02:11 -0500 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA19021; 24 Jun 95 13:53:55 CDT (Sat) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id NAA19018; Sat, 24 Jun 1995 13:53:54 -0500 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199506241853.NAA19018@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: Any experience on tcl7.4/tk4.0 ? To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Sat, 24 Jun 1995 13:53:54 -0500 (CDT) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@freebsd.org, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it In-Reply-To: <199506241723.DAA28701@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 25, 95 03:23:35 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 609 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >> The FreeBSD port of tcl 7.3 has diffs for the fpmask and the rounding > >> mode. These diffs apparently still apply (FreeBSD certainly hasn't > >> changed). It also has diffs for configuring strtod(). > >The NetBSD bmaked version I ported to FreeBSD doesn't seem to have these. Try > >leaving them out. > The fpmask() call is certainly required. The only uncertainty is whether > tcl already has it. NetBSD doesn't need it since all FPU exceptions are > masked by default in NetBSD. My apologies for confusing you. I'm referring to any strtod() change. The fpmask and fpsetround calls are in it.