From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 30 22:20:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249C537B401 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manganese.bos.dyndns.org (manganese.bos.dyndns.org [66.151.188.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E25243FF7 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from twilde@dyndns.org) Received: from manganese.bos.dyndns.org (twilde@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h615KcWN060879 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:20:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from twilde@dyndns.org) Received: from localhost (twilde@localhost)h615KcuB060869 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:20:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: manganese.bos.dyndns.org: twilde owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:20:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Wilde X-X-Sender: twilde@manganese.bos.dyndns.org To: ipfw@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: ipfw2: core dump with large { ip or ip2 } block X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 05:20:41 -0000 When trying to add a rule with a very large (>>100 IPs) { ip or ip2 or ... } block with ipfw2 I run into a core dump - I looked through the manpage and couldn't find any reference to a limit of number of IPs in one rule with or, is there such a limit, or am I running into a bug? If so, how should I go about making a non-stripped ipfw binary so I can provide a useful backtrace? Thanks. Tim Wilde -- Tim Wilde twilde@dyndns.org Systems Administrator Dynamic DNS Network Services http://www.dyndns.org/