From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Aug  5 16:34:10 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 885)
	id 17AD437B400; Mon,  5 Aug 2002 16:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:34:07 -0700
From: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org>
To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: patch to allow moved pkg comments
Message-ID: <20020805163407.A21728@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I wrote a patch that allows pkg-comment to be omitted, and in that case the
comment will be taken from the first line of pkg-descr. This change is
simple, safe, entirely conditionalized on pkg-comment not existing, and can
be entirely ignored if people don't like it. On the other hand, it allows a
potentially huge number of inodes to be reclaimed.

http://people.FreeBSD.org/~eric/ports-comment.diff

Please let me know what you think. Thanks!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message