From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 19 11:59:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C4C2FC7 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:59:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA091D12 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi5so486267wib.8 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 03:59:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9MFZ61/ZBMUHg+WiczNo+1BkSumQ5mbtNZ9ylk3B/w8=; b=OOIb3rAp2L+f/nYxzT93JA0LLm6gqlooTrs9wN+FB7jvqEWd1QYrEGDjlOIBV544rS 8r6MrcgyeQJMVlsKJ7JymjSCJJpCOF58kclvPB0ZR8u3V2qtkn27HIp3id9mDiube0q4 OI37YZCCzv7Da31U/HpnjFqPW5TA2Z58J5nZCaOwdSCSBSwT6Kw7Kluyno3iyDhBLSpY EFF80ffnjLjy5Qg3QaOt3XRnPj+gBIZagZINq8cWHLLrPc9SzbdqmDO3nNOldjaheksI ZvRWAwOVEMLt7lx88K+Ugfk+IyqWnQsulgX8FHfX7wZRTDC+GQjmOS8HyBwRZKNlNJMi WArA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.7.227 with SMTP id m3mr962476wia.59.1392811149186; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 03:59:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.71.18 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 03:59:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140219191631.49953e37@X220.alogt.com> References: <20140219191631.49953e37@X220.alogt.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:59:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD FFS SU+J is not stable From: David Demelier To: Erich Dollansky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:59:11 -0000 2014-02-19 12:16 GMT+01:00 Erich Dollansky : > Hi, > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:59:49 +0100 > David Demelier wrote: > >> Running 10.0-RELEASE, it is the second time I have a power failure and >> bad shutdown. It's also the second time I get a fsck failure. This >> time fsck has even segfault'ed. >> >> I think I will switch to ZFS. >> >> This is the log of the next boot up : http://imgur.com/rRpREKP >> >> Is it possible to automatically run fsck manually after this kind of >> failures? > > I thought that this got fixed over time. I have had such problems > before too. After turning journaling off, I did not ran into this > trouble anymore. Ok, I also invested in an UPS later. > Heh, that is a good idea, but I don't really plan to buy an UPS for a laptop haha :-). I may probably disable journalling too, with background fsck it's not a big deal. -- Demelier David