From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jun 9 19:32:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106DE37B401; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 19:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FreeBSD.org (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753A48B5D1; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 19:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D040FA7.9D688E74@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 19:32:07 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Anton Berezin , current@FreeBSD.ORG, John Hay , Szilveszter Adam Subject: Re: perl wrapper and PATH References: <20020608110834.A25686@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020608141128.D403-100000@femme.listmistress.org> <20020609104850.GC25520@heechee.tobez.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > At 12:48 PM +0200 6/9/02, Anton Berezin wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 02:14:09PM -0400, Trish Lynch wrote: > > > > > Anton, if you don;t get around to it this weekend, mind > > > if I take a stab at it? > > > >No, I don't mind at all. If only we can agree who does what. :-( > > RPI has been running with something like the perl wrapper on our > systems for many years. It can be very useful, if it's done > right. My fear is that everyone is hoping for some quick fix > (something as quick as creating a symlink), and does not want > to really think about what we want from this wrapper. And yet, with the use.perl script installed as part of the port, we can provide a solution that IS, "as quick as creating a symlink." tobez and I were discussing it some last night, and we have an idea for just automatically doing the right thing for -current systems that have no perl installed. I agree that for users who want perl, we should have a /usr/bin/perl that "just works." I also agree that more thought needs to go into what form that takes. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message