From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 12 18:07:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA27138 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 18:07:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA27110; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 18:06:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA14397; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 18:06:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1998 18:06:42 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199812130206.SAA14397@apollo.backplane.com> To: Brian Somers Cc: "Enoch Ceshkovsky" , "Gary Palmer" , current@FreeBSD.ORG, Eivind Eklund Subject: Re: NATD/Libalias leaks References: <199812130008.AAA16396@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :It looks like Matt's going to have a crack at alias_nbt according to :his followup to bin/8962. Well, I tried... but after staring at my old windows box (which I haven't turned on in a month) for a few minutes, I decided that actually trying to test the damn thing would be too stressful on my delicate constitution :-) We're going to need someone with a cable modem (like the original bug poster) who regularly gets malformed netbios packets to test it. I'm considering just comitting it (I don't think it will get adequate testing, else). :Brian Matthew Dillon Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet Communications & God knows what else. (Please include original email in any response) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message