From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 19 1:21:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBC337BB89 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 01:21:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX0002-Fujitsu Gateway) id SAA15110 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:20:43 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-0002-Fujitsu Domain Master) id SAA13660; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:20:42 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.162]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-0002) id SAA25753; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:20:41 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: IPv6 scoped addr format change X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000219182126A.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:21:26 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 50 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Unfortunately, I have a notice that IPv6 scoped addr format will change again. It is once changed as the recent discussion between people who are preparing IPv6 scoped addr draft for next IETF meeting in March, like below. From addr@scope To scope%addr And I committed the change. But, in more recent discussion, it further changed like below. From scope%addr To addr%scope Because some MIB expert commented that optional data before addr is not suitable for MIB definition. About that change I didn't committed yet, because I'm afraid of another change. But this time the proposal seems to be stable. But anyway, there is no guarantee that it can get concensus at March IETF meeting, and same format could be adopted in the RFC to be published after the meeting, maybe around April or later. But some scope addr format is need to be supported in 4.0. So now I think of following things. -Adopt the format below now, and never change it again before 4.0 release. addr%scope -If future RFC will adopt another format, then support it also. E.g, Print out in new format. Support each format as input. Sorry for flapping, but it is the best approach I can think of now. Thanks, Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message