From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 13:17:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3CB106564A for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 13:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C298FC13 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 13:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9EFBB5C34; Mon, 11 May 2009 09:17:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:17:00 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: Marcin Wisnicki Message-ID: <20090511131700.GA47969@atarininja.org> References: <4ad871310905101008n73d26145h3d81914925aab965@mail.gmail.com> <4ad871310905101222g63867982p6161ff0ddd1b6850@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] NO_INSTALL in meta-ports considered harmful X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:17:02 -0000 On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:28:34PM +0000, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki > > wrote: > >> They will be installed since they are run dependencies. > >> > >>From what I can tell (from several metaports) -- they, themselves, are > > not installed. The ports defined in the metaport are installed. > > That's the point. The metaports should be installed as well (reasons given > in my original mail). > > > There is no source code for, using your example, CUPS[1]. CUPS (in the > > FreeBSD ports tree) is, for lack of a better explanation, a pointer to > > which specific ports you need to have in order to get a fully operation > > CUPS system running. Looking at the Makefile for print/cups [2] you can > > see the dependencies and that CUPS is not actually built (which in > > definition is what makes this a metaport). > > I know this. > > The proper way to make a metaport is to: > 1. use only RUN_DEPENDS > 2. set NO_BUILD > 3. do *NOT* set NO_INSTALL > 4. provide empty do-install target > > There are several metaports that get it right, like for example x11/gnome2: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/gnome2/Makefile?rev=1.155 Based upon your description I think this is a bug in the CUPS port. I'd suggest you file a PR so that it can be tracked and (hopefully) addressed. -- WXS