From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jan 9 12:58:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA12222 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 12:58:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA12051 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 12:57:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.8.8/frmug-2.2/nospam) with UUCP id VAA18119 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 21:57:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.8/keltia-2.13/nospam) id VAA13761; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 21:38:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto) Message-ID: <19980109213828.44531@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 21:38:28 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding process ID listing to netstat References: <199801090654.AAA15353@detlev.UUCP> <28067.884362225@verdi.nethelp.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <28067.884362225@verdi.nethelp.no>; from sthaug@nethelp.no on Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 05:10:25PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#3963 AMD-K6 MMX @ 208 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk According to sthaug@nethelp.no: > Yes - but aren't you reimplementing lsof? Would it be a good idea to add > lsof to the base system instead, like top was added? The main "problem" with lsof is that it is changing often (although it is for many things we don't care about like other system's porting). -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #2: Thu Jan 8 00:49:00 CET 1998