From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 13:29:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307E0A31; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w8hdkim@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5FD8FC15; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so362114vba.13 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:29:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VYQiaq0TXFRZ8C8mdAhz9Qr4YFGxWmkV1zBXpjRou+Q=; b=oSaRX2TDPqjF4R/FKNL+624P6kRX+bNKKtUaxnkNNUwd/1wpDV+LSD/fbNhZNGJ6Us uqLVcSe9TfsxhJCKokZHIE2E4lZVDqYgr42a4ZBNYfRxqBZttUsd9Ye+C7s7pg0Ezj0u TfFj10Bqp5wchy0lS0y9SY2FV5RdkQyB4TzkGZYa4t5j0S+JiiNmWsl0udPlakKHDth6 3ICcIjXarOFLoA4+zZCOX4WG1lqMQmywyo4ae0dWJFtlFymcecBxtkecYIXuMHx7aKLo IgdXsHJE5/y2eI4n6+8iklwUTNY4Xbh2GAKQQO87rSILAD6Dq6+ZlqlSiFCNE0+Mhm0J okHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.94.225 with SMTP id df1mr42852431vdb.114.1351603741090; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.226.163 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:29:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121030121924.GD70741@FreeBSD.org> References: <20121030121924.GD70741@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:29:00 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Interfaces connected by bridge(4) do not pass arp replies From: Kim Culhan To: Gleb Smirnoff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Monthadar Al Jaberi , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:02 -0000 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Kim, > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:59:04PM -0400, Kim Culhan wrote: > K> >> What svn revision of FreeBSD -current are you running? > K> > > K> > FreeBSD head r238604. > K> > K> I should have mentioned earlier this is with r242126, there have been > K> some changes > K> to the network code since 238604, maybe that is why you don't have this problem. > > If you can do binary search, that may be valuable. > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. Ok I can begin that process, Monthadar since you have an earlier version can you try a test: >From a machine on one of your 2 interfaces, can you ping a machine on the other interface? Do you see the MAC for a machine on the other interface in the arp table? When this problem is present, it is possible to reach the router and out to the internet (if it is routed that way) but in the case of the wireless interface, for example, you cannot reach a machine on the wired interface. The interfaces here: bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 02:f3:8d:7d:04:00 inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 nd6 options=29 id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: msk0 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost 55 member: em0 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 2000000 member: wlan1 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 11 priority 128 path cost 33333 msk0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=c0019 ether 00:1e:8c:0a:50:e2 inet6 fe80::21e:8cff:fe0a:50e2%msk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active em0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=2098 ether 00:0e:0c:7f:cf:02 inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fe7f:cf02%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active In rc.conf the bridge is created with: ifconfig_bridge0="inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 addm wlan1 addm em0 addm msk0 up" thanks -kim