From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 18:51:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A421065674 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DD68FC19 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28609 invoked by uid 399); 23 Dec 2010 18:51:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 23 Dec 2010 18:51:36 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D139A36.1080208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:51:34 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101210 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <201012221916.oBMJGCMY069579@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpa Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libassuan Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/security/opensc Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:51:37 -0000 On 12/23/2010 10:41, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Whoa, it's strange for 2.0.0 to 2.0.1. There is no ABI change from > what I can tell, right? I am pretty sure about that if you do my > suggest like in other thread and it will bring back to .so.0. On a philosophical basis I don't think it's a good idea to make gratuitous changes to vendor's stuff, even if arguably their own change was gratuitous. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/