From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Jan  9 01:28:52 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA18214
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 01:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA18209
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 01:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA02592; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 01:28:45 -0800 (PST)
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2-BETA(2?) on ftp.cdrom.com 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 1997 21:35:54 EST."
             <199701090235.VAA04925@crh.cl.msu.edu> 
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1997 01:28:45 -0800
Message-ID: <2588.852802125@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

But ftp.cdrom.com doesn't run dot-zero releases either.  It's not
something I really recommend to any commercial site, unless they
definitely know what they're doing.  For something less than
ftp.cdrom.com I think you could probably run 2.2 without much grief.
For ftp.cdrom.com, it being a rather extreme case, I think staying
back a revision (in this case 2.1.6) is a better idea. :-)

					Jordan

> Might I suggest that before we roll a 2.2-RELEASE it first runs on
> ftp.cdrom.com for a few weeks?  If there is any system that can verify an OS,
> its cdrom.com!
> 
> -Crh
> 
>        Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu
> 
>                          http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich