From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 20:33:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED47016A401 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A72843D46 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:33:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2A417A1A; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:33:17 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:33:17 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "Kevin Oberman" Message-ID: <20060324223317.2069564f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20060323223424.D00D945042@ptavv.es.net> References: <20060323215738.C2181@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20060323223424.D00D945042@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.16; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, JoaoBR Subject: Re: nve timeout (and down) regression? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:33:36 -0000 On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:34:24 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:59:56 +0000 (UTC) > > From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" > > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: > > > > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > > > > nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case (for > > > me) in end of dezember > > > > > > since a month or so with recent releng_6 the problem came back, timeouts and > > > stopping rx/tx > > > > did you do more updates in the timeframe from december to about a > > month ago? > > > > if the problem was gone and is back now any (exact) dates to narrow > > down the timeframe where the problem came back would be very helpful. nve0: port 0xbc00-0xbc07 mem 0xfebfa000-0xfebfafff irq 22 at device 10.0 on pci0 nve0: Reserved 0x1000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0xfebfa000 nve0: Ethernet address 00:0a:48:1d:c6:97 miibus1: on nve0 nve0: bpf attached nve0: Ethernet address: 00:0a:48:1d:c6:97 nve0: [MPSAFE] This happens w/o any "real" activity on that interface (which goes into an Allied Telesyn switch): ....... Mar 24 19:39:54 worf kernel: nve0: device timeout (1) Mar 24 19:39:54 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to DOWN Mar 24 19:39:55 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to UP Mar 24 19:40:14 worf kernel: nve0: device timeout (1) Mar 24 19:40:14 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to DOWN Mar 24 19:40:15 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to UP Mar 24 19:40:33 worf kernel: nve0: device timeout (2) Mar 24 19:40:33 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to DOWN Mar 24 19:40:34 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to UP Mar 24 19:45:52 worf kernel: nve0: device timeout (1) Mar 24 19:45:52 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to DOWN Mar 24 19:45:53 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to UP ......... FreeBSD worf.tecnik93.com 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 21 01:39:15 EET 2006 itetcu@worf.tecnik93.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #442: Trojan horse ran out of hay