From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 05:09:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71EE496E for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 05:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34C42163 for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 05:09:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x13so526587qcv.33 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 22:09:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2DhynDlePJDpU/41BrLuPYRjoLQ59IEUv6mKkMSDJHE=; b=bYK6EADRc5LPFBQWpuAomf/GefxFEwJLV7k2+JfEbcyol8ZeKM6+KFz8tA5xMCy6KH OQA121eUgE6o2FI1fneMkwsa4yLXTaEjV3zUcJ10obvmYS9cK00J3HPYjgCfPorb6YPg BHkWWZ/JaTuXg5//Ts1b/dGUIl0zL0bPpvHqKwglyBLvIdHhkfK7GoI1LQaLqtmwUg2P 6K3nsvNfssWA3ZBzhgSI8jDWMr12vuHesNw04JuVVeIBg5HOdI0W1l+txY8uUO0Afv8X AZiKioXH3KEvNuLm5Pg8dgDUWAlOMZalHCjlXp0eaAfnkZCBXYynWoK5Wgj7XvJV04fh JslA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.108.4 with SMTP id i4mr57303429qgf.80.1399439355393; Tue, 06 May 2014 22:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.51.38 with HTTP; Tue, 6 May 2014 22:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 01:09:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: oops re: What ports tree to use on a Raspberry Pi? From: Alan Corey To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 05:09:16 -0000 OK, so that was a dumb statement that a database should have picked up that this wouldn't build on arm (if it's a generic ports tree). Does that mean arm needs its own ports tree? Or should I just build from raw tarballs and not use the ports system? Alan -- Credit is the root of all evil. - AB1JX