From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 10:46:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC45816A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:46:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.rahul.net (green.rahul.net [192.160.13.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A860D43D4C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:46:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conover@rahul.net) Received: from green.rahul.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by green.rahul.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 83CECBE8E5 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:46:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1003 invoked by uid 4199); 21 Dec 2004 10:45:08 -0000 Date: 21 Dec 2004 10:45:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20041221104508.1002.qmail@rahul.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: conover@rahul.net (John Conover) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: UFS2 with Soft Updates Robust? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Conover List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:46:33 -0000 Is UFS2 with soft updates the most robust file system in freebsd? Comments would be appreciated. Thanks, John -- John Conover, conover@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/