From owner-cvs-all Sat Jul 25 01:54:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA26193 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 01:54:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.133.1] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA26176; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 01:54:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA01059; Sat, 25 Jul 1998 10:50:59 +0200 (CEST) To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: committers@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: so many cvs-... mailing lists. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Jul 1998 16:39:53 PDT." <199807242339.QAA25878@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 10:50:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1057.901356656@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > do we need so many cvs-... mailing lists? > they are some of the least read lists. > even freebsd-tokenring is more popular than the number 2 cvs list. That pretty much settles the argument, doesn't it ? Kill 'em. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal