From owner-cvs-all Thu Dec 31 08:10:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA14769 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:10:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from oldnews.quick.net ([207.212.170.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA14763; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:10:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from donegan@oldnews.quick.net) Received: (from donegan@localhost) by oldnews.quick.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) id IAA26621; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:10:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 08:10:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Steven P. Donegan" To: The Hermit Hacker cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" , Mark Murray , "Jonathan M. Bresler" , alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.eud, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 31 Dec 1998, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Here here...I trust and like sendmail, and have no intentions of > switching from it... > Not to flame at all - but what wonderful things does postfix bring that would induce anyone to move away from sendmail? Move from something that works in the millions of systems, is understood by vast numbers of sys admins, etc? If postfix can do something sendmail can't what is it? And an answer that it's easier to configure isn't really valid for us lifer sendmail folks :-) My 'vote' on this subject is leave postfix in ports, not in the contrib tree. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message