From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 22 01:20:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C0516A421
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:20:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BFD043D46
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:20:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: (qmail 59677 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2005 01:20:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown)
	by unknown with SMTP; 22 Aug 2005 01:20:49 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:20:29 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Tor Egge <tegge@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200508211819.j7LIJ6XA060679@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050821201938.G17433@odysseus.silby.com>
References: <200508211819.j7LIJ6XA060679@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_softdep.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:20:52 -0000


On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Tor Egge wrote:

> tegge       2005-08-21 18:19:06 UTC
>
>  FreeBSD src repository
>
>  Modified files:
>    sys/ufs/ffs          ffs_softdep.c
>  Log:
>  Don't set the COMPLETE flag in an inodedep structure before the related
>  inode has been written.
>
>  Revision  Changes    Path
>  1.183     +1 -1      src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c

Based on your earlier explanation about this, what I gleaned was that this 
could've been responsible for all sorts of "unexpected softupdates 
inconsistencies" messages during fsck throughout the years.  Is that a 
correct understanding?

Mike "Silby" Silbersack