From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Mar  4 14: 0:51 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 15F0B37B719; Sun,  4 Mar 2001 14:00:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at)
Received: from deneb (deneb [128.130.111.2])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f24M0je10469;
	Sun, 4 Mar 2001 23:00:46 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 23:00:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: <steve@freebsd.org>
Cc: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/24383: libtool, USE_LIBTOOL, and graphics/dia
In-Reply-To: <200102260247.f1Q2lFG65229@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103042258070.58317-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 steve@freebsd.org wrote:
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: steve
> State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 25 18:45:07 PST 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
> Add DES suggested you can either use porteasy.  Or you can use portcheckout.

I'm grateful to those that helpfully suggested these workarounds (thus
solving my immediate problems) but I don't really consider these proper
*fixes* for the for the problem I reported.

Should this PR really be closed?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message