From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 13 11:33:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA10885 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jun 1996 11:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ceres.brunel.ac.uk (pp@ceres.brunel.ac.uk [134.83.176.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA10880 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 1996 11:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by ceres.brunel.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Thu, 13 Jun 1996 18:55:07 +0100 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with ESMTP id SAA05535; Thu, 13 Jun 1996 18:52:11 +0100 (BST) To: Dave Babler cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Gary Palmer Subject: Re: named setup question In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jun 1996 10:15:10 PDT." Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 18:52:09 +0100 Message-ID: <5533.834688329@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Dave Babler wrote in message ID : > The system _is_ currently working, in that all DNS operations work, but I > do periodically get notices like: > named: Lame server on '1.67.190.199.in-addr.arpa' ... What that means is that named found a nameserver which claims to be authoratitive for a domain, but gave a non-authoratitive answer. This is most commonly a nameserver configuration problem at THEIR end, but can have other reasons. Nothing you should really worry about. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info