From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 29 23:32:34 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA16106566B
	for <freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:32:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com)
Received: from parsely.rain.com (parsely.rain.com [199.26.172.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C138FC20
	for <freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:32:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com)
Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost)
	by parsely.rain.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with UUCP id m7TNWQj83190;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com)
Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24)
	id XAA01489; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:31:34 GMT
Message-Id: <200808292331.XAA01489@sopwith.solgatos.com>
To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:42:53 PDT."
	<48B86D5D.8060908@miralink.com> 
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:31:34 +0100
From: Dieter <freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com>
Cc: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DEBUG flag in fwdv.c 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD <freebsd-firewire.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-firewire>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-firewire-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-firewire>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-firewire-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-firewire>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-firewire-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:32:35 -0000

> Oooooo...there's a "DEBUG" compile flag in fwdv.c ... care to set it to 
> "1" and send me the output?  It might clue me into what bit needs to be 
> toggled to get your card back into shape.

Which problem is this for?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113785
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118093

I thought the idea for PR 113785 was to get the controller into
non-CYCLEMASTER mode?  I can't figure out why fwcontrol -f works
for NCR but not for VIA?

I don't see what fwdv.c has to do with PR 118093.

If you mean the NCR controller generating hundreds of bus resets,
the power cycle fixed it.