From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 00:32:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BDF1065670; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 00:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25468FC13; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 00:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so126312vws.13 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:32:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=H6IvrzQJJChKUA4Oj6D0c35Uzx/AN3p6g/zwVjx5zsI=; b=jkGEA9MXrwgGhkvEoyvMpPPs8kF4MYvys+Q2HFhc8q1AKs2MJLA1bFTKH9yKfXUXPc KeOyD9XEosw9cB+5ztEnMdPBRT2ff4AszBMoaLPv+jsF5dy6/QQcPsf0q0VfzCbu5GkR RujRtJ6KnfrbifOdNKrb7ehhJtP8bGO9aHWps= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.36.237 with SMTP id t13mr6151153vdj.45.1320107567014; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.164.101 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:32:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4EAF1F39.1090008@FreeBSD.org> References: <201110281426.00013.jhb@freebsd.org> <201110311024.07580.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111031190359.GP2258@hoeg.nl> <201110311717.53476.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111031221627.GR2258@hoeg.nl> <4EAF1F39.1090008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:32:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zPif2lHdC5z8HEWK8gvrnye0Tso Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Ed Schouten , Jilles Tjoelker , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fadvise(2) system call X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 00:32:48 -0000 On 31 October 2011 15:20, Doug Barton wrote: > On 10/31/2011 15:16, Ed Schouten wrote: >> What if we implement everything using the POSIX naming scheme, but put >> this in : > > My concern about that is that we're teaching people who start learning > programming with our sources to do non-standard stuff. .. if that keeps them on FreeBSD, what's wrong with that? :) It'd be fun to see the foot on the other shoe for a change. :) Adrian