From owner-freebsd-alpha  Mon May  3 13: 3:34 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCDF15628
	for <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  3 May 1999 13:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29193;
	Mon, 3 May 1999 13:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Installing FreeBSD 3.1 on a Multia box 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 May 1999 21:25:47 +1000."
             <199905031125.VAA16567@cimlogic.com.au> 
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 13:03:16 -0700
Message-ID: <29190.925761796@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > If we really feel that the Alpha is ready to stand on its own CD set,
> > I guess we could fork it off at this point.  There are already a
> > considerable number of packages available for it..  Making the CD
> > bootable, however, still won't be an option until somebody shows
> > us how to do it. :)
> 
> OK, well let's aim to make 4.0-current go in that direction.

Erm, just to clarify here, you're recommending we go to separate
distribution CDs at 4.0, or that we worry about bootable media
for the Alpha with 4.0?

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message