From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 15:39:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBE737B404 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-relay2.barrysworld.com (smtp-relay2.barrysworld.com [213.221.172.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64E043FBF for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:39:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from killing@barrysworld.com) Received: from [213.221.181.50] (helo=barrysworld.com) by smtp-relay2.barrysworld.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19mhmb-0004lX-Ty; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:38:25 +0100 Received: from vader [212.135.219.179] by barrysworld.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.15) id AD41987700DE; Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:42:09 +0100 Message-ID: <032401c36122$6ac8e940$b3db87d4@vader> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Marcel Moolenaar" References: <001d01c360ec$5c58aed0$0300a8c0@Xoanon><021301c360f0$c571e860$b3db87d4@vader> <20030812165610.GA579@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:38:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing system call in linux emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Steven Hartland List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:39:24 -0000 Hmm I couldn't even find these until I got to 2.5.X kernel so most strange they would be using these but I'll contact the dev at DICE to double check. Thanks for the info. Steve / K ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcel Moolenaar" To: "Steven Hartland" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 5:56 PM Subject: Re: Missing system call in linux emulation > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:42:51PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > > > > Any one know how I can track down what function is missing and hence > > look at fixing it? > > In the linux kernel source tree, look in arch/i386/kernel/entry.S. > There you'll find all the syscall entry points. Currently they go > all the way to 271. Also look at arch/alpha/kernel/entry.S... > > Then, in /sys/i386/linux look in syscalls.master. There you'll > see we only have syscalls up to 221. See also /sys/alpha/linux... > > One could: > o Add proper prototypes to syscalls.master of the 50 new syscalls > we don't know about, > o Declare all these syscalls as dummies (see linux_dummy.c) to begin > with, > o Really implement those syscalls that are used in practice. > > Syscall 252 is exit_group(2).