From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 14 15:57:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0339CCC; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4DF5F5; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r3EFv6cB010704; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:57:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r3EFv5kR010701; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:57:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:57:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Isabell Long Subject: Re: RFC: Changing the documentation's font style. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20130414085900.GA21307@yavin> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 14 Apr 2013 09:57:06 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:57:07 -0000 On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Isabell Long wrote: > The reason I specified Verdana in the beginning was to have some > familiarity between the website font and the documentation font - > before (and now) I think it looks disjointed. I have just made > font-family sans-serif without a specific default font, however. I've > kept the font-size specified as it makes for a nicer, smaller and less > huge and potentially daunting reading experience (to new users). Doesn't that depend on the user's browser and screen resolution? We have to assume that the reader is the one best qualified to decide what font size they need. > How's > http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ now, > as a compromise? Okay, but could you do another without a set font size?