From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 18:15:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0C916A404 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C114613C4BC for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 18:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4DIBbKS065981; Sun, 13 May 2007 11:11:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id l4DIBbOw065980; Sun, 13 May 2007 11:11:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:11:37 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Wilko Bulte Message-ID: <20070513181137.GB65902@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20070513175425.GA64710@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20070513181053.GA3296@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070513181053.GA3296@freebie.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process for requesting reverting patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:15:23 -0000 On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:10:53PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:54:25AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote.. > > What is the formal process to get a recent commit to > > -current reverted? Do I send email to core? For > > How about asking the committer who put it in CVS? > > Be prepared to explain why you think the commit should be > reverted. Did you read the PR? The details are there. gdb is broken with tcsh. Having a nonfunctioning debugger would seem to be a rather severe problem. -- Steve