From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 19 8: 6:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B5E37B422 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 08:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13bOz1-000KJI-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:06:55 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA70905 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:06:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:06:54 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: lcc compiler vs gcc Message-ID: <20000919160654.A70874@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there any reason we might consider allowing different basic compiler types, or would this just be far too complicated? What about lcc? Is it anywhere near useable for heavy-duty OS work? jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message