From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 19:40:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2A3349 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6697A1FB0 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so131792601ied.1 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=933zp2MI2TUB+QIY9WUBL7NyMb2VI7SelMMqr3dU0AE=; b=uGdRusdOsdmk9OF8Z1CHdQsQQwQKjBd9G/IdWKZxKWjFgxgpvf97qj0O4DCFzp86Ie zk+1TfGeBPKgfw+FZBplNiSV03FFpBb+lGwVeWWMjQojJOHE+3HqCBGfVREpQvktl45D omKdJwMByynLnGuF0du33RCcs5t4fO8dvVB7DIXgdujiTs8YSmLhmPtONLKuePbbFuBJ pe5m/eEH2czIlBJX+VUOAuKcoyUqUa19nyhINNjisPcBTRl57LK7O5OSQjx9RqFaVger ATEKd+ZkTITDGxCJSr7OPH7B96mRs9p+umUCIwL/z8gliNrsC/7BDWe0m5c7xy2GATAD CYlQ== X-Received: by 10.107.135.35 with SMTP id j35mr14774710iod.91.1431373224643; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.5] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y124sm10350304iod.13.2015.05.11.12.40.23 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 May 2015 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <555105C1.50401@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:40:49 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Radel CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: c_rehash pgm missing from 10.1 References: <554E3771.5060709@gmail.com> <20150509180516.3471c1ae@curlew.lan> <554E4119.9010206@gmail.com> <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <5550FCBE.1020909@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 19:40:25 -0000 Jon Radel wrote: > On 5/9/15 1:17 PM, Ernie Luzar wrote: >> The real question is why is it not included in the base system? >> > Things might get better if you install source; I swear we discussed > that in one of the gazillion threads you've kicked off. Or more > precisely, the fact that CA.pl is installed in /usr/src along with > other openssl utilities that come along with the base version of openssl. > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > Well I do install a fresh operating system from a .iso file every time a new RELEASE is published . Its my understanding that the RELEASE build is from a system maintained from source. So there is no reason for a .iso installed OS to be any different from a OS installed from source. If there is a difference then the RELEASE build method has a big problem. Also missing is c_client and the CA.pl & CA.sh scripts from a base op install from a .iso cdrom.