From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 23 7:36:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E56A37B401; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5EA43E6E; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:36:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA06093; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:36:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g9NEaEF09117; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:36:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15798.46046.23616.967908@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:36:14 -0400 (EDT) To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Alexander Kabaev , "David O'Brien" , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure) In-Reply-To: <20021023142044.GD31781@sunbay.com> References: <200210210942.g9L9gLpM025724@beast.freebsd.org> <15796.17145.909288.498725@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021022142929.GB48398@sunbay.com> <20021022220221.3a8e2312.kabaev@bellatlantic.net> <15798.43826.90549.275914@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20021023142044.GD31781@sunbay.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ruslan Ermilov writes: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:59:14AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Alexander Kabaev writes: > > > I hope this problem is fixed now. Let me know if I am sadly mistaken > > > about that :) > > > > Thanks! > > > > It seems to fix it when building groff directly from the src > > directory (eg, after your kernel change, yesterday's binaries work). > > > > I'm building the world now. > > > Nice. I was going to ask Peter to upgrade beast with this fix, but > now that you've already tested it, I'd like to back out the hack in > groff/src/roff/groff/Makefile, if there are no objections. > > What do we do with NO_CPU_CFLAGS? Should we special-case groff or > ${MACHINE_ARCH} = "alpha" in bsd.cpu.mk? I wasn't clear enough.. The static binaries built yesterday with NO_CPU_CFLAGS now appear to work. The problem was apparently something to do with the kernel exec code in the face of having one PLT_LOAD segment. I have not yet attempted a shared binary (as I have not installed the new rtld). I'll try building a shared binary after the buildworld completes, and back out the earlier hack assuming it works. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message