From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Apr 26 16:47: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from postoffice.aims.com.au (advanc2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.119.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DF537B423 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:47:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@aims.com.au) Received: from postoffice.aims.com.au (nts-ts1.aims.private [192.168.10.2]) by postoffice.aims.com.au with ESMTP id f3QNkpi94958 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:46:51 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris@aims.com.au) Received: from ntsts1 by aims.com.au with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:45:49 +1000 Reply-To: From: "Chris Knight" To: Cc: Subject: RE: rdesktop port (was RE: Help) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 09:45:47 +1000 Message-ID: <059401c0ceab$053283e0$020aa8c0@aims.private> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <01042618264801.00553@dwcjr.inethouston.net> Importance: Normal X-Return-Path: chris@aims.com.au X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Howdy, Well, I tried my best to get it committed before the 4.3 release, but it didn't happen. The Responsible Person for the PR just hasn't done it yet :-( Regards, Chris Knight Systems Administrator AIMS Independent Computer Professionals Tel: +61 3 6334 6664 Fax: +61 3 6331 7032 Mob: +61 419 528 795 Web: http://www.aims.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: David W.Chapman Jr. [mailto:dwcjr@inethouston.net] > Sent: Friday, 27 April 2001 9:27 > To: Chris Knight > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: rdesktop port (was RE: Help) > > > Its on sourceforge now so there's no worry about it going > anywhere for a while, but who knows. Yes it definitely does, > I'm running the version patched from your port and it works > great, definitely something we need in the ports tree, how come > it hasn't been committed yet? the citrix port does the same > thing but its very bloated compared to this with the linux > emulation it needs. > < [snip] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message