From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 25 17:41:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id D326916A407; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A7C16A402; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548DB13C458; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1PH48Cl006657; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:04:08 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <47C2F508.8030100@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:04:08 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kip Macy References: <200802220822.m1M8Mmsm061884@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200802220822.m1M8Mmsm061884@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.4 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 135946 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:41:21 -0000 Kip Macy wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=135946 > > Change 135946 by kmacy@pandemonium:kmacy:xen31 on 2008/02/22 08:22:28 > > remove unneeded devices > Last time I tried paring down the kernel config, I ran into problems with the kernel getting too small for the sizing assumptions that Xen has in locore. Maybe this is related to the report that arrived last night? Scott