From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 18 19:54:45 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B54C16A46B
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:54:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ben@desync.com)
Received: from bitcloud.desync.com (bitcloud.desync.com [64.157.15.125])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9BA13C4DB
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:54:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ben@desync.com)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (adsl-76-217-67-156.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net
	[76.217.67.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by bitcloud.desync.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6FD130C33
	for <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <AB3CA3F7-8B85-40EE-85D4-0053EF77F018@desync.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
From: ben wilber <ben@desync.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:38:50 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Subject: Handbook PF
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:54:45 -0000

Hi,

What do people think of having a little more of our own PF  
documentation in the Handbook?  It's quickly becoming a popular  
firewall package and the Handbook doesn't really do it justice.

Maybe some real-world scenarios and commonly used solutions, like NAT  
for an office network or authpf for a secured server.

bw.