From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 23 18:23:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E001916A4CE; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1B343D2D; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:23:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (24-161-166-146.san.rr.com [24.161.166.146]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0721710049A; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:23:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.COM To: Ken Smith Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:23:46 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200404221720.i3MHKDjG066787@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040422190049.GA19359@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20040422190049.GA19359@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404231823.46377.wes@softweyr.com> cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: Garance A Drosihn cc: Ken Smith Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys copyright.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 01:23:51 -0000 On Thursday 22 April 2004 12:00, Ken Smith wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:57:56PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > At 2:27 PM -0400 4/22/04, Ken Smith wrote: > > >... so just for confirmation: Basically any line > > >that has the word 'copyright' on it most likely needs to be > > >changed, though engage brain briefly before changing it (e.g. > > >if it's buried inside of the UCB copyright statement leave it > > >alone, just FBSD copyrights). Is that more or less the algorithm? > > > > I don't think we can just do that across all source files in > > the system, if that's what you are thinking of. > > Yeah, after a small amount of poking around I realized that can't > be the right algorithm. :-) I asked Ruslan privately to provide > a hint what the right algorthm is. :-) The right algorithm for most source files is to update the copyright statement if and only if you're fixing something, too. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com