From owner-cvs-all Tue Apr 2 1:50: 7 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from relay1.macomnet.ru (relay1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D43037B41F; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 01:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (maxim@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14]) by relay1.macomnet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g329nmT9688565; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:49:48 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:49:48 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Maxim Konovalov , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.c In-Reply-To: <20020402014214.A61546@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20020402134328.N10263-100000@news1.macomnet.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 01:42-0800, Apr 2, 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:36:46AM -0800, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > Submitted by: kris (an early version of this patch) > > Does this really have anything in common with my patch? The one I > recall writing a long time ago (but not committing) cleaned up > incorrect packet size and structure assumptions in the code. Yes, it does. I splitted your patch to four parts and Bruce Evans reviewed them. Of course, I made a lot of modifications and rewrote ip options parsing part completely but other are based on your patch and I thougth it was a good idea to mention about it. Did I do anything wrong? -- Maxim Konovalov, MAcomnet, Internet-Intranet Dept., system engineer phone: +7 (095) 796-9079, mailto:maxim@macomnet.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message