From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 3 11:00:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59A016A4CE for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:00:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fritz.delphinium.net (pcp487354pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net [68.55.21.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B014E43D31 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rtoren@bronzedragon.net) Message-ID: <41384ED0.4070103@bronzedragon.net> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 07:00:32 -0400 From: RRrp Toren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: MichelKempes@tweakdsl.delphinium.net References: <413763C1.90208@bronzedragon.net> <1B4160E2-FD0E-11D8-A54A-003065A20588@mac.com> <200409022039.59406.MichelKempes@tweakdsl.nl> In-Reply-To: <200409022039.59406.MichelKempes@tweakdsl.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3 NICs - 1 upstream, 2 downstream to same subnet?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 11:00:09 -0000 Michel Kempes wrote: >>The second problem you are having is that you can't have two NIC on the >>same subnet. > > > Well it is possible to do but it is kind of useless to put 2 nic interfaces on > the same subnet, unless you can have 1 gbit incomming and 2 100 nic > downstreaming it over the subnet but this will need a load balance setup. This probably is a terminology thing. "on the same subnet" and "servicing the same subnet" aren't the same thing, to me. I am not talking about electricly connecting both NICs to the same segment ("on the subnet"), but rather each NIC having in independant segment (physically), with machine IPs coming from the same subnet pool of addresses (but being unique, of course). Rip