From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Apr 26 17:14:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC46937B423
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net)
Received: from dwcjr.inethouston.net (unknown [216.118.21.153])
	by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 7FCCE10F40F; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:14:17 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: David W.Chapman Jr. <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: "Chris Knight" <chris@aims.com.au>
Subject: Re: rdesktop port (was RE: Help)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:14:13 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
References: <059401c0ceab$053283e0$020aa8c0@aims.private>
In-Reply-To: <059401c0ceab$053283e0$020aa8c0@aims.private>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01042619141304.00553@dwcjr.inethouston.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Well I know how that is, maybe we can get some attention on this and, your 
shar looks fine to me but I'm not use if you're supposed to use USEXLIB or 
X_PREFIX in the port.  I know I didn't spell those right, just off the top of 
my head.

On Thursday 26 April 2001 18:45, Chris Knight wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Well, I tried my best to get it committed before the 4.3 release, but it
> didn't happen. The Responsible Person for the PR just hasn't done it yet
> :-(
>
> Regards,
> Chris Knight
> Systems Administrator
> AIMS Independent Computer Professionals
> Tel: +61 3 6334 6664  Fax: +61 3 6331 7032  Mob: +61 419 528 795
> Web: http://www.aims.com.au
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David W.Chapman Jr. [mailto:dwcjr@inethouston.net]
> > Sent: Friday, 27 April 2001 9:27
> > To: Chris Knight
> > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: rdesktop port (was RE: Help)
> >
> >
> > Its on sourceforge now so there's no worry about it going
> > anywhere for a while, but who knows.  Yes it definitely does,
> > I'm running the version patched from your port and it works
> > great, definitely something we need in the ports tree, how come
> > it hasn't been committed yet?  the citrix port does the same
> > thing but its very bloated compared to this with the linux
> > emulation it needs.
>
> < [snip]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message