From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jul 19  0:52:38 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from abraham.chaosdev.org (chaosdev.org [194.17.41.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264AC150F1
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from plundis@chaosdev.org)
Received: from localhost (plundis@localhost)
	by abraham.chaosdev.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id JAA11945;
	Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:49:21 +0200
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:49:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Per Lundberg <plundis@chaosdev.org>
To: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: glibc
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907190041390.1379-100000@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907190946100.11914-100000@abraham.chaosdev.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:

> I seriously doubt this will make porting any easier.

You think so? I experience a lot of this when I try to recompile stuff for
FreeBSD (most of it are due to lack of a real getopt routine).

> c.) dependencies on bugs in glibc.

What bugs have you found in glibc 2.1.1? Have you reported those to the
GNU folks?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message