From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 20:07:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FE416A420 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D50A43D48 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i4so26814wra for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=n5j/JxJ2uOuA0kL7r4KiG8XMEEOv2f08U1KnRsOHOza4fjteWMV0sqYZhhtcip8/lkZdgTUUtpaDmX1k+/xIE63EMYS8mw/RqiDkWyRORqEUTtVSum4L+FlekULs5LQwMGKtxyVicQ6Kt+Sgi2H/C4kXMge/njZquJIj03aFvAo= Received: by 10.54.54.41 with SMTP id c41mr55557wra; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.124.11 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:07:46 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton To: FreeBSD - Questions In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nikolas Britton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 20:07:48 -0000 On 7/26/05, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, > normally I build my kernels the old school way? >=20 > Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about > -Os, safe to use? >=20 > The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. >=20 > Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE > is commented out in the default kernel? >=20 > Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported > to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec > HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x >=20 > ---------- >=20 > Feel free to add more questions to this thread. >=20 One more thing... Will FreeBSD 5.4 kernel modules work under 6.x?