From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 02:57:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4341AE; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eadler@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6EF738; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1I2vqD8065815; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:57:52 GMT (envelope-from eadler@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from eadler@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1I2vqtZ065811; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:57:52 GMT (envelope-from eadler) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:57:52 GMT Message-Id: <201302180257.r1I2vqtZ065811@freefall.freebsd.org> To: torsten.eichstaedt@web.de, eadler@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org From: eadler@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: standards/176222: Package & Ports Is _Much_ Too Complicated. I Consider It Broken. X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:57:53 -0000 Synopsis: Package & Ports Is _Much_ Too Complicated. I Consider It Broken. State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: eadler State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 18 02:57:52 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: I've sent a private mail explaining that these sorts of discussions are ill-suited to a bug tracker, and I've asked that the OP please follow up to the ports@ mailing list to start the discussion http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176222