From owner-freebsd-java Sat Mar 11 15:27:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.79.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2974B37B9E9 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.79.115]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19532; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 16:27:20 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA04192; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 16:27:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 16:27:18 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003112327.QAA04192@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Andrew Atrens" Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bug - `try' doesn't catch sigfpe In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The subject says it all. Running the latest and greatest 1.1.8, I was > asked to try out the spec benchmark to see how fast (and robust) 1.1.8 was > on FreeBSD. The test immediately croaked when some code purposely did a > divide by 0 in a `try' block. The benchmark expected the `try' to fail, > but did not expect the app to core. I thought we fixed that bug in one of the later 1.1.8 release. Are you sure you're running the latest/greatest release? On which version of FreeBSD? Can you send out the test code you're using to verify the bug? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message