From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 16 19:48:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051nc7.san.rr.com (unknown [204.210.32.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356521525D for ; Sun, 16 May 1999 19:47:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051nc7.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA25190; Sun, 16 May 1999 19:45:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <373F82C9.152EDBC0@dal.net> Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 19:45:29 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dg@root.com Cc: Brian Behlendorf , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: maxusers/nmbclusters References: <199905152052.NAA13650@implode.root.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Greenman wrote: > > >For those running -stable in heavy production use: > > > >Anyone running maxusers > 128? > >Anyone setting nmbclusters >= 8192? > > > >I have a 2.2.8 system with maxusers set to 512 and nmbclusters set to > >8192, and I'm *still* in need of more resources (e.g., a panic induced > >yesterday by "Out of mbuf clusters - increase maxusers!"). I was planning > >on moving (through a reinstall, actually) to 3.x-stable, but I want to be > >sure I'm not chomping off more than can be chewed. I know about the > >panics various people have seen - I'm confident that'll be cleaned up. > >I'm more concerned about posts I've seen recently claiming "you shouldn't > >push maxusers > 128 on 3.x-stable" - I just wanted to know if this was > >dependent on any factors I could mitigate. > > On wcarchive, maxusers is 1000 and NMBCLUSTERS is 100000. Don't try that at > home, folks, without kernel modifications. > With the change to increase the kernel VM in 3.2, you should be able to > crank both up significantly. I can't say how much without doing a careful > analysis of KVM usage. We run our IRC servers on 2.2.x with maxusers set to 512 and nmbclusters set to 15000 and have for a long time. Higher settings seem to cause more problems than they solve due to the lack of the abovementioned kernel mods. HTH, Doug -- *** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network *** Nominated for quote of the year is the statement made by Representative Dick Armey (Texas), who when asked if he were in the President's place, would he resign, responded: "If I were in the President's place I would not get a chance to resign. I would be lying in a pool of my own blood hearing Mrs. Armey standing over me saying, 'How do I reload this damn thing?'" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message