From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 31 13:15:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ints.ru (ints.ru [194.67.173.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7623114F37 for ; Mon, 31 May 1999 13:14:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ilmar@ws-ilmar.ints.ru) Received: from ws-ilmar.ints.ru (ws-ilmar.ints.ru [194.67.173.16]) by ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA14436; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 00:14:15 +0400 (MSD) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ws-ilmar.ints.ru (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA37140; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 00:14:14 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 00:14:13 +0400 (MSD) From: "Ilmar S. Habibulin" To: Snob Art Genre Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: auditors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 31 May 1999, Snob Art Genre wrote: > > And what about posix auditing? Robert Watson made posix.1e audit > > implementation for freebsd. Why do not use his work? > > Different kind of auditing. The first is people vetting code for > security flaws, the second is logging of system events. Oh, i suppose i misunderstood term "auditing". You we talking about source code auditing? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message