From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 09:49:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205B016A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: from tarc.po.cs.msu.su (tarc.po.cs.msu.su [158.250.16.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D62843D55 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: from tarc.po.cs.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarc.po.cs.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j589n55q041844; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:49:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from tarc@tarc.po.cs.msu.su) Received: (from tarc@localhost) by tarc.po.cs.msu.su (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id j589n4re041843; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:49:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from tarc) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:49:03 +0400 From: Tarc To: Clarence Chu Message-ID: <20050608094903.GB22981@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> References: <20050608065836.GA22981@tarc.po.cs.msu.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: 5.4-release + 6.0-current on the same disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 09:49:19 -0000 hm.... I found this decision on documentation for loader(8) in /usr/share/examples/bootforth/menuconf.4th , but in this case you should be familar with Forth language. What about different slices?! this is simple and difference is on boot time(please, mark, that I work on an i386) On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:27:59PM +0800, Clarence Chu wrote: > > > > >If it is actual today, you can play with loader.conf options (so write own > >beastie menu) and the kernel option ROOTDEVNAME. > >On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:50:25AM +0800, Clarence Chu wrote: > > i have problem related to the difference in disklabel format and you > point me to loader.conf modification. anyway, can you make both > 5.4-p? and 6.0-CURRENT to co-exist on the same disk? -- Best regards, Arseny Nasokin